A defined area
Choose an area small enough to inspect completely. Identify the records, access constraints and responsible reviewers.
THE PILOT APPROACH
Choose the area and required drawings and reports. Compare both methods against the same scope, quality checks and delivery costs.
Choose an area small enough to inspect completely. Identify the records, access constraints and responsible reviewers.
Produce the agreed drawing and report using both approaches. Record failed attempts, reviews and corrections.
Compare accepted quality and full delivery cost. Keep first-job setup separate from assumptions about repeat work.
COMPARE DELIVERY COSTS
Enter your assumptions and download the comparison. Values stay in this tab until you download them.
FIRST JOB / REPEAT WORK
Use the base worksheet above for the first delivery; the optional extra-correction scenario stays separate. Enter setup, repeat delivery and recurring costs to compare a defined program.
DECIDE WHETHER TO EXPAND
Use the delivered work and recorded costs to answer these questions.
Were all required assets and locations addressed? Count missed, inaccessible and disputed items in the result. Record the applicable drawing and source revisions.
Did independent checks meet the agreed task requirements? Could the recipient use the delivered files? Record corrections and unresolved findings.
Include capture, inspection, reconstruction, drawing, review, rework, equipment and acceptance. Separate first-job setup from a repeat-job estimate.
Test the handoff, field conditions, reviewer responsibilities and data route. Identify who can maintain the record after the pilot team leaves.
Before expanding: confirm that the owner accepts the deliverable, major gaps are resolved and the complete cost supports the next scope. Record the result even when it shows no saving.